From Prophecy to Reality: How "Future Shock" and “Third Wave” Predicted the Emergence of ChatGPT and AI

-

 

The recent excitement surrounding CHATGPT reminds me of two books I read: “Future Shock” and “The Third Wave”.  Both works, written by Alvin Toffler, were intellectually stimulating, and provided thought-provoking visions of the future.  Although they were published a long time ago, in 1970 and 1980 respectively, long before the advent of AI, many of Toffler’s predictions are still applicable today.  They provide valuable perspectives on the impact of technology and societal change on individuals and organizations.

One of Toffler’s predictions that has come to fruition is the accelerating pace of change.  He wrote about how technology and societal changes would happen at an ever-increasing rate, which holds true today as we continue to witness the rapid development of AI, the internet, and other technological innovations such as robotics and mechatronics.  In “The Third Wave”, Toffler identified three waves of societal change, with the third wave being the current digital revolution that is transforming the world as we know it.  He foresaw the idea of “future shock”, which refers to the growing sense of disorientation, uncertainty, and anxiety that can arise when individuals are unable to cope with the rapid pace of change.  

Another accurate prediction of Toffler’s is the shift from a production-oriented society to a knowledge-based society.  This shift has been driven by the rapid advancement of technology and the growing significance of information and knowledge in our daily lives.  The rise of the internet and the widespread use of computers and digital devices have made it easier for people to access information and have transformed the way we work, learn, and interact with one another. Toffler highlights the importance of education and lifelong learning to remain competitive in a world where knowledge has become increasingly valuable.  He quoted psychologist Herbert Gerjuoy, who warned that in the future, “the illiterate will not be the person who can’t read; he will be the person who has not learned how to learn,”

Another Toffler prediction that has materialized is the impact of technology on the job market.  He foresaw that the rapid pace of technological progress would lead to the obsolescence of certain jobs and the need for individuals to be adaptable and continually acquire new skills to stay relevant and employable in a rapidly changing technological landscape.  This is evident in the automation of certain jobs and the growing demand for skills in areas such as computer programming and data analysis.  There is a need for digital literacy and other tech-related skills as technology continues to advance at a rapid pace.

Another aspect of Toffler’s predictions that could still materialize is the shift towards a more decentralized and networked society.  Toffler writes about the breakdown of traditional hierarchical structures and the emergence of a more decentralized and interconnected society.  This is already happening to some degree with the rise of the gig economy, remote work, and decentralized networks, but it may still fully materialize in the future as AI and other technological innovations continue to reshape the way we work, live, and interact with each other.

However, there are also some aspects of Toffler’s predictions that I feel may not come to fruition.  For instance, Toffler wrote about the possibility of technology freeing people from the constraints of time and space.  While technology has certainly made it easier for people to work and communicate from anywhere, it has also resulted in a blurring of boundaries between work and leisure time and has created new forms of work-related stress and burnout.  In this sense, technology has not brought about the utopian future that Toffler envisioned.  Another prediction of Toffler that may not materialize is the emergence of a new form of social organization to replace the traditional family structure brought about by an increased emphasis on individuality and independence.  While the traditional family structure has been evolving, it has not yet been replaced by a completely new form of social organization.  Furthermore, the importance of relationships and family structure may endure despite technological advances.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amid Chaos, there is Opportunity

-
  Ukrainian War reminds me of the Browning version of Agamemnon: τὸν κρατοῦντα μαλθακῶς   θεὸς πρόσωθεν εὐμενῶς προσδέρκεται translated in English: “ God from afar looks graciously upon a gentle master ”   God ,  from afar ,  looks kindly on  one who exercises his  strength  gently.   No one, indeed, would willingly assumes and bears the heavy burden and yoke of wartime leadership. And I get it, the pressure is massive, the responsibility is formidable. But as Sun Tzu once said, “In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity”. Indeed, amid all the mayhem, there is also opportunity for a leader to hold tight to his convictions, unfazed by the prospect of death, and lead by example.   As Sun Tzu once said, “A leader leads by example, not by force”. Slava Ukraini!
Read more

God versus Principalities

-
  In the confusing, dizzying and often deceptive realm of “principalities, powers, rulers of darkness and spiritual wickedness in high places” (Ephesians 6 [12]), we often experience the bitter concoction of deceitful maneuvers and machinations (cloaked under the guise and rhetoric of “God works in mysterious ways”).   Stripped away all the rhetoric, as a wise friend once told me, it all boils down to “like or dislike” (translated in Filipino, “Kung gusto, maraming paraan. Kung ayaw, maraming dahilan”).   Despite the prevalent preaching about being non-judgmental from the pulpit, there seems to be a disparity when it comes to practicing what is preached.   Often, we hear the adage of “walking the talk”, yet how many of those who deliver such preachings would withstand scrutiny if put to the test?   Here is my perspective:   Is there a God?   Absolutely.   I believe there is a God because God has manifested his presence to me.   I have see...
Read more

Rankings exists in a Constant State of Flux

-
  With all the brouhaha about U.P. sliding into second place as the country’s premier university upon the recent release of the THE world university rankings, I’ll add in my two cents worth.    Firstly, ranking universities via submitted data by the universities is like judging a beauty pageant using only data of the individual contestants like height, weight, bra size, eye color, waistline measurement, etc.   For all you know, she might be walking with a limp, is cross-eyed and lacking a tooth.   Without actual site visits and interviewing the different stakeholders (parents, students, faculty, and staff) like local accreditors usually do, it’s like ranking the pageant contestants without seeing the candidates up front or interviewing them.    Second, THE and ARWU puts more weight on research and citations of research outputs whereas QS puts more weight on student experience (e.g., diverse/international student body, student faculty ratio), teach...
Read more